ContraRarian

“Everything that irritates us about others can lead
us to an understanding of ourselves.” - Carl Jung

[member of planet atheism and the atheist blogroll.]

Posts tagged Philosophy

Jun 29
Mdkster’s Razor: Never attribute to intellect that which may be adequately explained by technical incompetence.

Mdkster’s Razor: Never attribute to intellect that which may be adequately explained by technical incompetence.


Jun 30

Jun 19

Seversky skewers Christianity

I see they’re back to the Problem of Evil.  Again. 

It’ll all be Adam (and Eve’s) fault for trying a fruit diet.  Again.

There’ll be no satisfactory explanation of why an omniscient being didn’t see it coming a mile off and why an omnipotent being didn’t do anything about it.  Again.

There’ll be no moral justification for punishing not just the original offenders but all their descendants in perpetuity.  Again.

There’ll be no explanation of why God lied to Adam and no discussion of what that implies for everything else God is reported to have said.  Again.

Finally, and much more fundamentally, there will be no discussion of why a necessary being, such as the Christian God must be to be an Uncaused First Cause, would ever create a Universe and populate it with beings with whom he wants to enter into a loving relationship. Again.

A beautiful takedown of Christian theology and apologetics by Seversky @ atbc


May 24

Oct 29

QualiaSoup - Open-Mindedness   (ht: csa)


Aug 26
“It is a dogma of the Roman Church that the existence of God can be proved by natural reason. Now this dogma would make it impossible for me to be a Roman Catholic. If I thought of God as another being like myself, outside myself, only infinitely more powerful, then I would regard it as my duty to defy him.” Ludwig Wittgenstein (via fuckyeahexistentialism)

Aug 3
“Much of Indian (and any other metaphysics) is little more than an ingenious postponement of the stage when the philosopher has to admit that he does not know what he is talking about: and since what he is talking about is God Almighty, this admission is never altogether a surprise.” - Aubrey Menen, “The Ramayana” (ht:tcement via sully)

Jul 5
“It’s interesting that Socrates is sometimes treated as an exemplar of Western rationalism, when he is so critical of mere reason and so dependent on wisdom by divine beneficence. A main target of this dialogue is the idea that true wisdom comes empirically, when Socrates believes it comes by daemonic grace. Socratic truth is not cold or empirical, but divine and ecstatic. I think Socrates wants us, in the end, to also be a bit unsure of how we know anything. He remarks that Theaetetus will now be kinder and gentler “for you will have the wisdom not to think you know that which you do not know.” A recurrent theme in the text is the arrogance of those who assume they are wise. In fact, there are two drives at work in the dialogue: the Greek philosophical tradition of undermining the arguments of other thinkers and the Socratic criticism of one’s own ideas as a route to humility. It’s not clear, at least to me, which aspect wins out in the end.” Plato: Theaetetus and Arguing with Others (via azspot)

Jul 1
“Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but…will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones” Marcus Aurelius (via friendlyatheist)

May 30

If God can’t save non-Christians He is not all-powerful. If He won’t, He is not all-loving. If he can’t be with us unless we “choose” Him, he is not omniscient or omnipresent. Why then do Christians believe in such a small, petty, limited “god”?


May 23

…the basic criticism of both Christian and Muslim exclusivism is that it denies by implication that God, the sole creator of the world and of all humanity, is loving, gracious and merciful, and that His love and mercy extend to all humankind. If God is the creator of the entire human race, is it credible that God would set up a system by which hundreds of millions of men, women and children, the majority of the human race, are destined through no fault of their own to eternal torment in hell? I say ‘through no fault of their own’ because it cannot be anyone’s fault that they were born where they were instead of within what exclusivism regards as the one limited area of salvation.

One exclusivist Christian philosopher, William Lane Craig, has tried to meet this difficulty by appealing to the idea of ‘middle knowledge’, the idea that God knows what every human being would do in all conceivable circumstances. He then claims that God knows of all those who have not had the Christian Gospel presented to them that, if it were presented to them, they would reject it. It is therefore not unjust that they, constituting the majority of humanity, should be condemned. But this is manifestly an a priori dogma, condemning hundreds of millions of people without any knowledge of them; and even many other very conservative Christian philosophers have found it repugnant. For on any reasonable view exclusivism, practiced within any religion, is incompatible with the existence of a God whose grace and mercy extends to the entire human race.

John Hick : Philosopher of Religion & Theologian

Apr 26

Epistemic Closure - A Simple Guide (v.1)
I knocked this up after readying some rather depressing comments on the subject over at Hotair. Comments & suggestions welcome… Is “bad” the wrong word!?

Epistemic Closure - A Simple Guide (v.1)

I knocked this up after readying some rather depressing comments on the subject over at Hotair. Comments & suggestions welcome… Is “bad” the wrong word!?


Apr 14

Apr 13

Page 1 of 2